SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jamie153 who wrote (1143261)6/20/2019 2:52:45 PM
From: mel2211 Recommendation

Recommended By
locogringo

  Read Replies (2) of 1579806
 
>> The cap gains problem is a lie you can't get away from so you lost this one.

Boy, you are not bright, and not smart at the same time. As a liberal shill, you do not disappoint.

I told you I game the system and play by the rules. I also play to win.

Before I retired, I reset my capital gains to nearly 0. This largely avoids the capital gains problem.

I also have an HSA, so I can shelter nearly $8K there.

The ACA income threshold for me is $65K, so I can recognize about $73K of income.

If my average gain is 10%, then I can sell equities to get $73K of capital gain. This means, I can sell around $700K of stock annually and still receive the $17K ACA subsidy.

>> ACA doesn't give subsidies to people who spend a lot of money

Your stupidity on display again. ACA doesn't care about how much I spend. Only about how much income I recognize in a year.

So, in my situation, I could spend a little over $600K every year.

And the best part??? The Subsidy is tax free!!!!!

Thank you Obama!!!! And Nancy... and Harry and the insurance companies who made it happen.

As we like to say these days. WINNING!!!!!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext