2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 378.38

+2.7%

Nov 10 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

marcher

To: louel who wrote (149446)	6/28/2019 9:04:39 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 217661

Actually whether you vote or not you are entitled to express whatever opinion you like about the outcome. You do not forfeit your right to have an opinion because you can't be bothered voting in a statistically insignificant way. Not voting is not ordaining the outcome. A non voter would be perfectly reasonable to take up arms to overthrow the outcome. For example if the vote was to enforce slavery, or exterminate Jewry, or enforce Islamic rule, it would be ethical to defeat the winners by force of arms. An electoral outcome has no moral or ethical implication. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next