SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Taking Advantage of a Sharply Changing Environment
NRG 156.40+1.1%12:30 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
3bar
Hawkmoon
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (2005)6/28/2019 11:46:57 PM
From: Doug R2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 6356
 
Here's a diamond from Diamond.
A solid rundown of Zharkova's latest.


Some of my own thinking is;
Her model doesn't show the Sporer Minimum (as seen in terrestrial temperature reconstructions of the period) to have been a result of solar activity.
The explanation given, a nearby supernova at the time, threw enough cosmic rays into Earth's system to do what a deep GSM would do.
This shows that there are more avenues to higher cosmic rays than just solar activity.
Magnetosphere strength data has also been reconstructed for the past 10s of thousands of years and longer.
Magnetosphere strength does not follow the same GSM cycle at all so it is one of those non-solar factors. Its weakening, if the laws of physics don't change, will have similar cosmic ray results as those from the Sporer Nova.....with a "super" grand solar minimum piling on.
The cosmic ray situation will continue to deteriorate for decades no matter how the dust settles on all the different Zharkova editorials.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext