SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
toccodolce
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1145613)6/30/2019 3:51:00 PM
From: Fintas1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 1578058
 
Might have, would have, could have.

The issue that was KNOWN was IRAN had been identified as a country that was supplying weapons to this country and that country and had been involved with this country and that country.

So it wasn't a question of what the leaders of IRAN were doing or in fact thinking. DEATH TO AMERICA.

It was a question of understanding it's probably not a wise decision to hand over X billion to be used to continue those efforts and more.

So you walk away. If others agree with you fine.

If not you identify who THEY are and you deal with them as required.

But what you do not do, is ignore or rationalize until one day that country that could have been contained is now a serious danger.

That's my view.

You are entitled to yours.

Fintas
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News