SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1146576)7/4/2019 2:17:45 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

   of 1578501
 
When California lost Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), it looked as though the title for Stupidest Woman In The United States Senate™ had been lost, too. But thanks to the election of Kamala Harris to fill her role, California has retained its titleholder.

On Friday, Harris tweeted:



Kamala Harris

?@KamalaHarris





Judge Gorsuch has consistently valued narrow legalisms over real lives. I cannot support his nomination.https://t.co/ocDD7DvKnd



3,083

10:46 AM - Mar 24, 2017
Twitter Ads info and privacy



Sen. Kamala Harris: Why I cannot support Judge GorsuchThe Senate’s responsibility to advise and consent on a lifetime Supreme Court appointment is one I take extremely seriously. Every time you see a black child graduate from college, or a same-sex...

sfchronicle.com




1,551 people are talking about this



And there was an op-ed to back up this idiotic contention. In it, Harris argued that Gorsuch, a man so qualified that literally not one Democrat cast a vote against him for his federal appellate court position, was unqualified to be on the Supreme Court. Why? Because the Court “has the power to do enormous good,” and Gorsuch wouldn’t do such good. What good would he forego as a result of being, you know, a judge? According to Harris, he would have voted to strike down laws forcing teachers to pay union dues. Because, you know, that’s a violation of their First Amendment rights, among other obvious legal issues.

But Harris says that because Gorsuch might take a look at that stupid old Constitution, he can’t be confirmed. “As US senators,” she writes, “we have an obligation to also examine a nominee’s legal approach and ask whether he or she considers the impact of those decisions on our society and the daily lives of our people.”

It would be awesome if we had some sort of independent elected branch to make public policy, wouldn’t it?

But according to Harris, judges should fufill the mandate of Thurgood Marshall, who said, “You do what you think is right and let the law catch up.” Which, coincidentally, is also something that dictators say.

But never mind. Harris knows what’s right for America: judges who openly ignore legalism in order to apply her standards of morality.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext