Dear ahhto2,
I grant that my response to your post leaves an implication of fault for posting what Daniel Culver told you. I apologise for that. That was why I began the post with "Nothing against you, ahhto2,. . ."
I think I bothered to point out in the post my feeling that people who post on this board are being sincere and that goes for Malcolm as well. I also enjoyed some of his allegories although they did not prove to be allegories.
But does it not make sense to anyone that if the company, or its spokesmen or its promoters leak information that proves untrue, it is deceptive? It is you yourselves who hope for the truth of it that should take umbrage at the falsehood of the expectations so raised.
Based on past experience, I was cynical about any meaningful news release coming out yesterday. My cynicism proved true. Based on the track record, I doubt we will see anything on Feb 1 (not because you made it up, but because the guys leaking the news of newsrelease are not dealing in reliable information), although I very much hope that there will be something on that day.
Perhaps this is too much for many posters on this thread to handle and I hope this sets the record straight that I meant to cast no aspersion on your good will in posting what you heard. And, again, I hope you are right.
Sincerely, S.T.
FWIW (and this is not to you, ahhto2), I have bought and sold Fonar and have known of Bill Matthews' newsletter (and have in my possession an autographed copy of his book) long before this forum came into existence. Please don't get snooty simply because you can't argue with the facts. |
