SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : XYBR - Xybernaut

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10PreviousNext  
From: StockDung7/17/2019 12:13:55 PM
   of 6847
 
XYBERNAUT FRAUD NEWS->SEC Obtains Final Judgement Against Menachem Eitan and Zev SaltsmanLitigation Release No. 24534 / July 17, 2019SEC v. Zev Saltsman, et al., Civil Action No. 07-CV- 4370 (NGG) (E.D.N.Y.)
On June 5, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained final judgments against Israeli residents Menachem Eitan and Zev Saltsman.

The SEC's complaint, filed on October 19, 2007 and amended on March 23, 2015, alleged that Eitan and Saltsman controlled an Israeli investor group that participated in a fraudulent scheme to purchase controlling blocks of stock in two publicly traded companies - Xybernaut Corp. and Ramp Corp. - while misleading the investing public as to the true ownership of the companies' shares. To facilitate the scheme, Eitan and Saltsman allegedly paid kickbacks to the companies' officers and directors in exchange for access to future transactions with favorable terms. Saltsman and Eitan also allegedly sold unregistered shares of the two companies and failed to file ownership reports.

Eitan and Saltman consented to the final judgments, entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, permanently enjoining them from violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, the registration provisions of Sections 5(a), 5(b)(2), and 5(c) of the Securities Act, and the reporting and beneficial ownership disclosure provisions of Sections 13(d) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1, 13d-2 and 16a-3 thereunder. The final judgment against Eitan orders him to pay $500,000 in disgorgement. The final judgment against Saltsman orders him to pay $5 million in disgorgement, which shall be deemed satisfied by the criminal restitution paid by Saltsman in a parallel criminal action.

The Commission's action continues against the remaining defendant, Andrew Brown.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10PreviousNext