SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Montello Resources

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mackle who wrote (1402)1/21/1998 9:22:00 PM
From: Jesse  Read Replies (1) of 4256
 
Thanks for that Mackle! I agree with everything you said except perhaps the reason for the absence of mineral trains (m.t.'s). Overburden to date has shown to be fairly shallow (though I believe on some properties it may prove to be much thicker).

Couldn't the lack of m.t.'s be because BH kimb-pipe glacial erosion is virtually non-extant, or at least only nominally affected? The steadfastness of the pipes (at shallow depth with little breakup) could mean that no trains are present because the deposits remain at site. [I am by no means an expert] This would also mean that the full composite pipes would offer much greater tonnage, due to fixed deposition.

Re. the mineral indicators pointing toward eclogitic diamonds-- these types of stones are, historically, larger and of premium quality (which fits ACA's findings to date), and originate beneath the source strata for peridotitic, thus lending towards the theory of the AB Buffalo craton being plenty thick to host an economic deposit (contrary to some skeptics).
mountainprovince.com

Also, you are so correct in pointing out the logistics factor of target selection by Ashton! Who knows what lie ahead? <G>
_________
I must warn you, I know little of what I speak!

Best Regards,
-j
:>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext