Bentway, I'm going to be Mueller for a second here. I accuse you of murder. I have not been able to find evidence that you are not guilty of murder. If the MSM is consistent in treating you as they have treated Trump, then the MSM will conclude that you are guilty of murder. How? Because I used a double negative. "I have NOT been able to find evidence that you are NOT guilty of murder" is NOT the same thing as "I have been able to find evidence that you are guilty of murder." Taking the double negative out of a sentence does not make the new sentence true.
Is my first statement with the double negatives true? Absolutely. Does it prove you are guilty of murder? Absolutely not. To assume my statement proved your guilt is a logical fallacy. The entire Democratic Party, their liberal base, and the MSM have failed to adhere to logic. In our system of justice, you must prove a person is guilty after charging them of a crime, showing the preponderance of evidence that passes the threshold of reasonable doubt, and then a person is convicted of that crime by his peers. In the Mueller case, he never indicted Trump, he never proved guilt, he never found enough evidence to be able to indict, and therefore, he never even came close to giving anyone the tools to impeach or convict. Trump is innocent until proven guilty. That is our system of Justice. Anything short of that is simply Totalitarianism. Democrats have Totalitarian instincts. They don't like Trump, therefore, they will fabricate lies and break any law to get him out of office. That's a problem when 50% of the country has lost their minds and decided that lawlessness, violence, and totalitarianism is better than allowing our Democracy to function as it was intended. |
