The Trump Presidency Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (131457)	8/4/2019 12:10:57 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) of 353853

>> You mean like that time when they wouldn't let Merritt Garland be voted on? That was absolutely constitutional. But Republicans will have to pay for that at some future date. I believe Mitch had no choice on that. He couldn't just stand by and allow Obama to get that appointment unchallenged. It is the first time in memory that Republicans have stood up to Democrat,notably Schumer, on a Supreme Court appointment. Still, that right is absolutely within the power of the Senate. There is no constitutional requirement that they bring any appointment to a vote. I was really referring to bogus court decisions, the recent law in California regarding ballot eligibility, the recent law in NY trying to release Trump's tax returns, the bogus Mueller investigation that appears now to have been a sham. It is a damned mess.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next