SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Taking Advantage of a Sharply Changing Environment
NRG 149.85-0.5%Jan 14 3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Hawkmoon
maceng2
To: maceng2 who wrote (2154)8/5/2019 7:33:16 AM
From: Doug R2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 6365
 
The paper, as far as I can tell, is based on the cyclical magnetic rhythms within the Sun that are thought to be influenced by barycentric motion.
The particulars between planets and the Sun and Earth and the Sun as far as that motion are not really relevant.
The barycentric motions happen as they do regardless of the causes assigned by humans.
Those motions, regardless of their cause, are said to influence the Sun's inner magnetic cycles.
Zharkova analyzed those cycles...not causes of or influences on barycentric motions themselves.

If it's not barycentric motions that influence the magnetic cycles, it's of little importance to the calculations dealing with the magnetic cycles...since they're occurring regardless of the causes assigned to them.

Also, Zharkova's conclusions as to the climate response do not include either the magnetic polar reversal, or the wider perspective that Rolf Witzsche discusses.

Her conclusions are based on the "all things remaining equal" assumption.
Which should be avoided at this time in history.

But, as you zoom in on her forecast and look at the next 20 or 30 years instead of the "big" time frame she's projecting out to...it's gonna suck.
The crowd that seems to really want a full blown ice age don't appreciate the part about the longer, underlying trend still being on an upswing...but who the hell is going to be around for that part anyway? It's the next 30 years that matters most.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News