SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Steve Felix who wrote (62355)8/13/2019 7:23:34 PM
From: Spekulatius  Read Replies (1) of 78787
 
Re CC - I looked at this briefly. Their EV value is ~$6B consisting of $2B in equity and $4B in debt. EBITDA this year is $1-1.5B. I don’t know what their environmental liabilities will be, bit note that in their worst year 2016, they paid $330M, which would be less than 1/3 of their. EBITDA. The current valuation implies that they would pay out $330M every year, at which CC would trade at 8x EBITDA, which is still fairly cheap.

Business wise, I note that Fluorpolymers has ENITDA margins north of 25% and TiO2 even higher than that. TiO2 needs a lot of Capex though.

To me $2B in market cap is too cheap. CC almost trades like and equity stub, but it doesn’t seem distressed. I also think they have a point that Dupont lowballed the environment liabilities at spinoff. Make no mistake, this is a “crappola” spin-off, where DuPont wanted to get rid of some unwanted liabilities and business, but those business seem to be of a quite high quality. especially fluorochemicals isn’t that economically sensitive, I think. Might be a candidate to buy leap calls.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext