Gene,
Good for you. I was hoping you could verify this morning.
Laurens, I resent your tone and the fact you say I did nothing. I tried to verify some of the information you sent me. As I mentioned before, either the phone #'s were bad or they were disconnected. I am not questioning the validity of your statements but I am questioning the "James Bondish 007" aura that surrounds the information of your posts. I, like Skaar do not place total credibility in a disgruntled, displaced ex-employe who has nothing to lose in degrading his former company. IMO, we should, at least at this juncture, be concentrating on why this stock had a significant rebound yesterday. Was it manpulated? Was it based on positive, but as yet unpublished news? Or is it going to tank today or very soon?
A prudent person would probably take a breakeven and run. But my last entry into this, as I mentioned before was impulsive, not prudent, so I'm sticking to impulsive and holding. I am like Hraka, whatever I do probably will be wrong. On the otherhand, maybe there is life to this baby. I think we will find out soon.
Regards,
HG |
