Vanni, we have a number of posters here from Singapore whom I'm sure will check out your claims. I sure that, collectively, they can also comment on the strengths and weaknesses of each broker. Can you?
But you've still not provided much information. Even if these brokers did revise their earnings estimates, that doesn't do us much good without knowing the magnitude or direction of those changes.
But if you'd told us even the names of the brokers at the time, we could have checked them out.
I note that all of these brokers are Asian. This is certainly important information. I cerntainly would not say that any 20 (or whatever) Asian brokers are going to come up with the same numbers as some selection of U.S. brokers. This may provide a more or less accurate picture than U.S. analysts, but it certainly provides a *different* picture.
I don't see your purpose in not posting details. If you'd posted the details, they would have been verified positively or negatively, and you'd either be proven a liar, or the issue of credibility would never have come up. IF you are telling the truth, posting details only helps your credibility. Posting vague comments serves only to make it impossible to verify your statements.
And I do recommend verification of *anything* written here by anybody. That doesn't mean that everybody has to verify everything. If everyone verifies just one fact each, we have a very powerful tool here.
BTW, Yappy, our purpose here is not to show our knowledge of the brokerage community. It's to share information about investing and trading. You're not here to do that, but to heckle and tease with partial or incorrect information. |
