The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (3209)	9/3/2019 8:22:17 PM
From: GPS Info	Read Replies (1) of 13834

Was that OK because as GPS calls 1945 as the Get of free jail card date.. you agree ? When did I say 1945 was "get [out] of free jail card date"? You first claimed that "You are giving out get out of jail free cars for too easily. I think this is a poor interpretation of my comments, and somehow you have jumped from forced annexations to IP theft. I can't equate the two types of theft. The United Nations created the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in 1967 and China joined in 1980. So, I would say that China's IP thefts after 1980 should be condemned in a similar, but not equal fashion as forced annexations. ME: OK, so what is your arbitrary cutoff for forcibly annexing other people? Has that time come yet? TBS: I have none.. I have said many times.. few things in life are black or white.. (binary) Grey is a good colour... If you really have no cutoff then you support or condone forced annexations and IP theft up to the present day. I condemn countries after my cutoff, and there is nothing much that can be done before it. Without a cutoff you can't justifiably condemn anyone or you functionally condemn everyone over all time, and do nothing about it. It's all catch as catch can. That would work well for China, and I guess that would be your point. To me, that is a recipe for World War III and the eventual use of nuclear weapons. On a previous topic: The A-holes like Ms. Clinton tweeting about HK... Maybe addressing the US rampage in shootings might be more appropriate ? Why can't she do both? Are you against free speech like the CCP? Is she less informed that anyone on SI? Could she have picked up any information as Secretary of State regarding China and Hong Kong that you or I don't possess? Does she have any more practical experience in international relations than you or anyone else on SI?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next