SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Grainne who wrote (16203)1/22/1998 2:12:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
I am a little confused about Linda Tripp's role, but there were legal experts on television last night saying her early telephone wiretapping was probably admissable because she was acting in her official capacity as an officer sworn to uphold the law.

Officer? She's a secretary at the Pentagon. She's claimed she tapped her calls to and from Lewinsky to "protect herself". From what? If asked about Clinton's sex life in court she need only have said she had no personal knowledge of it. Hearsay evidence--what Lewinsky told her--is not admissable, far as I know.

More simply, however, she could have told Lewinsky she didn't want to be the recipient of these confidences. Something here is more than slightly stinky.

Workplace violations? According to Lewinsky's White House boss, she threw herself at Clinton. No allegations of harrassment have been lodged, to my knowledge.

As noted before, what a bunch of braindead people. All Clinton had to do was say "Yes, we had an affair". End of story.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext