SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 386.01+1.6%4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
pak73
Pogeu Mahone
To: twmoore who wrote (150782)9/19/2019 6:03:53 PM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 217713
 
It's complicated. In a nutshell... I'm on the fence too. But I operate on different first principles from most. Earth was never in balance. From the carboniferous it has been stripping carbon from the ecosphere in a tragedy of the commons. It has buried that carbon in colossal deposits of limestone, coal, shale, tars,oil and gas. Also in kilometres of marine deposits.

Plants were starving at 280ppm.

Now we've got it up to a pleasant 400ppm after 100 years of vast effort during which time about a third of the CO2 has already been removed.

It looks as though 600ppm of CO2 will have a net good effect.

So I'm not worried. Sea level rise is trivial. Insignificant compared with a meteor in the Pacific ocean.
The climate models have proved to be hopeless.

There's lotsto think about.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News