SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: stuffbug who wrote (273658)10/3/2019 12:55:02 PM
From: LoneClone3 Recommendations

Recommended By
ayeyou
onepath
Terry Maloney

  Read Replies (2) of 312318
 
OT: As with the guy in that video that was recently posted here, it is obvious that you are doing the exact opposite of science, starting from the premise that there is no anthropogenic global warming and then presenting evidence that supports your premise while ignoring the much larger and more robust body of evidence that contradicts your position.

Please ask yourself why it is so important to you that there not be global warming, to the extent that it makes you promote junk 'non-science' while avoiding actual science. I am very curious as to why you are so threatened by the idea.

I would love for there not to be anthropogenic global warming, but because I start from an objective rather than an ideological viewpoint, weighing all the evidence leads me to the conclusion that it is real and is an existential threat to our civilization.

For the sake of Ralfph and the board I will do my best to restrict my reaction to your dangerous nonsense, but it would be much better for everyone if you didn't post it here in the first place.

LC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext