SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Anchan
onepath
Terry Maloney
To: stuffbug who wrote (273658)10/3/2019 6:00:58 PM
From: marcos3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 312346
 
There is no Planet B.

If we're listing basics in bold, let's be sure to get that one front and centre.

Sure there are natural factors, of course plants get their carbon from the air, yes warming is probably slower than particular parties have predicted, no doubt the science has room for improvement [as always with science], and some do mistake weather events for climate at times

We don't see anyone arguing otherwise here ... so what's the plan - To somehow conflate a state of no 'emergency' requiring immediate 'panic and alarm' with a guaranteed eternal state of no concerns whatever, therefore Drill Baby Drill And Pump That Toxic Black Goop Across Anybody's Front Yard Ya Like And F. Them!?

... well excuse me, but i think there's more to consider in the situation ... can't accept the last sentence at all - if you step it down a little [actually a lot], and say that 'affordable' [which means what exactly?] energy is one of the important factors, then why would they ignore the desirability of getting that energy from sustainable sources? ... why would they ignore the possibility of conservation? ... why would they completely ignore the price to be paid by our gggg-kids if/when their DBDAPTTBGAAFYYLAF.T policy f.s up the planet?

Climate change aside, our gggg-kids will consider us demented savages for burning up millions of years worth of fermented dinosaur juice to push thousands of pounds of metal vehicles around the roads just to pick up trivial amounts of trivial crap we mostly don't need ... what's left by their time will quite likely have far higher value as raw material for needed petrochemicals

I see low quality argument put forward on both sides of this issue ... as on most, usually, unfortunately ... i would have expected better from you, who have typed some highly sensible stuff on stocks ... and really, it's a bit rich to get prissy on LC and onepath, who happen to get faced with this post during trading hours ... i likely would have responded too, was just busy at the time ... btw, imho, there are all sorts of points of view on the matter, it's not an Either-Or situation whether you're talking the current science or the current politics

Careful who ya blame for what [broad and perhaps obscure analogy] - youtube.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext