SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1168991)10/7/2019 5:50:25 AM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) of 1572245
 
Mark Twain said "A gold mine was a hole in the ground with a liar on top".

I think something similar could be said today about Climate Change.

A "Global Warmer" is a computer model with a liar making climate predictions with it.

Here are the conclusions from that stem from that post by Euan Mearns in September 2015. My emphasis using the emboldment on the third point.

euanmearns.com

"Concluding Comments
-Quasi cyclical changes in the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) correspond to quasi cyclical changes in global surface temperatures. The AMO is modulated by changes in the pace of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). All of these phenomena can be linked to cyclical changes in the pace of global thermo-haline circulation.

-While it is difficult to predict, the AMO should be heading into its cooling leg (note that the cooling leg begins past the peak of the warm phase). The Met Office report [1] provides supporting evidence for this from multiple sources.


-Both the US NOAA and UK Met Office now seem to be fully aware of the role played by natural cyclical changes in the oceans in modulating the decade scale cyclical climate change we observe on Earth. And yet both organisations seem content to mislead the public and politicians by seeking to explain all variations from the recent average at specific locations by means of anthropogenic global warming."


Has any data come to light since 2015 to show Euan Mearns conclusions to be incorrect? Please don't show me any more model stuff. I like models, but as with all statistical analysis, models have to be used with an unbiased eye. You have clearly shown your are incapable of saying there is a correlation between the AMO phenomenon and the observed temperature record. Any discussion about climate models is pointless as you are incapable of looking at them with a neutral eye.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext