SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (1172661)10/21/2019 5:25:24 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (4) of 1571714
 
There is no science evidence that CO2 has or is causing any of the increase in global temperatures via a greenhouse gas mechanism. There is no science evidence that the so called sensitivities postulated by the IPCC with their models has any connection with reality.

youtube.com this ted talk is by an IPCC shill. It is garbage. IMHO

But CO2 non greenhouse effects global land temperatures may go up. The mean temperature of green areas is higher than the mean temperature of deserts. Deserts are decreasing and green areas are getting greener and increasing.

In higher latitude area increased taller green growth could shorten the length of snow cover over time.

Taller growth being dark bark would absorb solar energy earlier and conduct down into the ground sooner. Branches create wind breaks. leaf cover also insulates and decay generates heat. And green means far more productive biospheres. All of these things capture the sun's heat of the day and store for slow release.

How many extra megatons of biomass are created daily in a land area twice the size of the USA.

I took Zharkova comment on C02 as understanding the fist of the IPCC environmental mafia as her work show it is the Sun, the Sun and the Sun. Or she is doing her work and has not analyzed what IPCC hot shots are saying and why. She assumes they are as competent and ethical as she is and take them at their word.

In the PDF there is description of a hind cast and it showed some connection to past warm and cold periods.
IPCC models are a hind casting joke of some imaginary lala land.

My impression does not see a
more Mathematician than Physicist and a political realist.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News