SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1176209)11/7/2019 2:40:16 AM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) of 1576528
 
From the link.

jpl.nasa.gov



"Since its launch, Jason-2/OSTM charted nearly 2 inches (5 centimeters) of global sea level rise, a critical measure of climate change."


I will be looking at some of the work produced if and when I get the time. These local doubters have not seen it. I and I talked to one who has lived there full time for 40+ years. Remembers each storm too.






Meanwhile I look at this xy graph. I like to see the noise when I see a graph. Usually hard to find when you see Climate change stuff.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

I am showing it as "fair use" for educative purposes.

copyright.gov



So looking at the graph on the right, you can see that over half a million years or whatever we can see sea level (proxy for temperature) does correlate with CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.

The R squared is 0.68.

When the temperature is warmer, there is more plant life, and a bigger food chain.

The temperature still goes back down though.

In addition, if you pick any given sea level, or any given CO2 concentration, you can see there is quite a bit of "noise". You can get a lot of answers from any given level/concentration. Discounting, say, the electric current in weather phenomena, Cosmic Ray Index, Sun Spots being a proxy for other variables, lots of things might be causing that "noise". Yet all these other variables have been discounted by the IPCC.

Those interaction graphs you show dont tell the story to me at all.

A respected IPCC modeler has resigned because he knew the models were too simplistic.

Doesn't look right to me.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News