SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (143287)11/10/2019 6:39:57 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (3) of 361335
 
I'm gonna try to get off this topic, but I really feel the need to drive home the point that in an investigation, the investigator doesn't just investigate the crimes or the people he or she wants to suspect. And in fact, the worst investigations are those where alternatives aren't investigated. Where the spouse is arrested for murder without checking out other credible alternatives. You don't do that. But that is precisely what Schiff is doing.

You cannot credibly refuse to have the whistleblower testify. This argument that "all he did was to blow the whistle" is nonsense. He has to explain where he got his information. How he came to report it. Did he speak with Schiff first, or go to the lawyer who claimed the "coup" started in January 2017, or that the impeachment was beginning then. These look like apparent "setups" and cannot be ignored.

Every person who has knowledge needs to testify. And I suppose since we're allowing opinions on the anti-Trumpites, we need to allow opinions from Trump supporters.

Okay, you get the last word if you want it on this.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext