SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technology Stocks & Market Talk With Don Wolanchuk
SOXL 41.75+8.2%Dec 19 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: da_cheif™ who wrote (130605)11/14/2019 2:09:56 PM
From: h_2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Chip McVickar
marcher

  Read Replies (1) of 207356
 
Not trying to get the last word in, LOL, but there's a property peculiar to microwave radiation that's highly unusual: it doesn't follow the normal toxicity dose response. Weaker field densities can actually be more harmful than stronger ones. This is commonly known as the "window effect" and it defies most of known medical science.

So it's possible that using the speaker option is more harmful than having it an inch from your head. This is just one reason why doing meta-analyses of earlier studies is so problematic. Without several different field densities being experimented with at the same time with the same controlled conditions, data can appear contradictory or even flawed when they're actually demonstrating the window effect.

I've been studying this topic for decades, and I have to say it's almost as complicated as markets.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News