Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1181898)	12/2/2019 10:14:39 AM
From: Jamie153	Read Replies (1) of 1573074

The rule has been tested in court and it lost. Federal judge in Trump tax case picks apart DOJ rule barring indictment of president salon.com You said Barr would have stopped him from testing the rule but Barr was AG for only a short time. Mueller knew he might be fired by the nut in the WH so why didn't he test it right away? He could have forced the idiot to testify within a month of taking his job. Why didn't he? Flynn still hasn't been sentenced. The evidence is overwhelming that Mueller is corrupt. Mueller could have indicted Trump and then tested it in court. Why didn't he? It looks like he knew Sessions and Rosenstein were going to fired to leave room for someone who would protect him so he waited until Barr protected him. History will not be kind to Mueller, or the FBI. They let a criminal go free.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next