Investment Chat Board Lawsuits Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

SI Dave

To: sense who wrote (12284)	12/5/2019 12:59:32 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) of 12465

tru·ism - a statement that is obviously true and says nothing new or interesting ===== "If we simply accepted bad actors assertions of innocence on face value as true until proven otherwise... always assuming their good faith... no one would ever be found guilty." [Ya think?] "behavior of bad actors in justifying egregious behavior... using the law to provide the veneer of legality... and legitimacy." [Wait, people do something for one reason but claim they did it for another? Stop the presses.] I could go on, but hopefully you get the point of how just stating the obvious does not advance the discussion in any substantive way. Both Dave and I have tried our best to explain to you, and anyone following along, that CDA 230 is settled law. Specifically: "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider". If you, or anyone else, would like to cite specific examples of how a given entity is violating CDA 230, go for it. Otherwise, I think it's time to move on. - Jeff

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next