2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 368.31

+0.6%

Nov 7 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Pogeu Mahone

To: TobagoJack who wrote (151885)	12/7/2019 2:07:07 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 217620

The USA could have started 25 years ago by protecting Qualcomm. The USA has in recent years joined ZTE Huawei Apple Samsung Europe Korea Japan India in attacking Qualcomm. The U.S. is very focused on ensuring there’s a viable alternative to Huawei and ZTE. We don’t want to be out there saying no. We want to be out there saying yes,” Adam Boehler, the first chief executive officer of the DFC, said in a recent interview. USA could try defending Qualcomm instead of attacking Qualcomm with absurd claims of monopoly. If Qualcomm had a monopoly QCOM would be worth over $5 trillion not $100 billion with Apple at $1.2 trillion and Huawei Samsung Google Amazon Microsoft etc worth $10 trillion or so. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next