Franklin, Andrews, Kramer & Edelstein Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Franklin, Andrews, Kramer & Edelstein

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: scion who wrote (12290)	12/9/2019 6:50:25 AM
From: scion	of 12881

Responses from people featured in The Afghanistan Papers By Craig Whitlock, Jenn Abelson and Meryl Kornfield Dec. 9, 2019 at 10:45 a.m. GMT washingtonpost.com For the project, The Washington Post attempted to contact everyone whom it was able to identify as having given an interview to the Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction for its Lessons Learned program. The documents disclosed by SIGAR identified 62 interviewees by name. Through additional reporting, The Post independently identified 33 other people who were interviewed, including several former ambassadors, generals and White House officials. Many of those interviewed by SIGAR declined to comment or said they wanted to read the Afghanistan Papers before commenting. Some could not be reached. Below are reactions from those individuals who wanted to respond further. (All were emailed statements except where noted.) Confidential documents reveal U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan washingtonpost.com Database: Explore the documents washingtonpost.com ... MORE washingtonpost.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next