SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Land Shark who wrote (1183943)12/9/2019 3:33:57 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) of 1576887
 
Sharkie,
Sorry Bubba, the SCOTUS ruled some time ago that with Nixon that "Executive Privilege" is not to be used as a tool to protect the president from being held accountable for his crimes.
That's right, keep emphasizing the fact that you haven't watched the video and have no intention of ever doing so.

Yes, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Nixon that he could not use executive privilege to avoid complying with subpoena requests. A few days after that ruling, Nixon then resigned.

However, that ruling does NOT give the House carte blanche in issuing subpoenas that can NEVER be challenged. Nor does it get rid of the whole purpose of "executive privilege," which still exists and has been used by administrations following Nixon.

Hence Trump is well within his rights to challenge the House subpoenas via the court. IF the court then ruled in favor of the House, and Trump continued to defy the courts, THEN the House would have a justification to impeach the president on obstruction charges.

But the House didn't even wait for the court to decide. Instead, the House decided to be the judge, jury, and executioner.

That's the whole essence of "separation of powers." The judiciary is in charge of resolving these disputes.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext