| | | When the FBI sent a spy to talk to Papa, Papa made it clear that he was against treasonous collusion with Russia. Thus, the FBI knew Papa was a great candidate for cooperation. Why did they break protocol and treat Papa as hostile?
The FBI received a notification from a friendly country, which is known to be Australia, that a Trump campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, had received a “suggestion” from Russia that it could assist the campaign by releasing information “damaging to Mrs. Clinton (and President Obama).” That was it. That’s the justification.
Here’s what that thin predication was adequate for in the FBI I grew up in: An agent from a field office, not headquarters, would have contacted Mr. Papadopoulos, interviewed him to get more details, enlisted his cooperation against the Russians, if warranted, and that would have been it. Misfired 'Hurricane': Comey's team abused Carter Page and the FBI
By Kevin R. Brock (former FBI assistant director of intelligence, FBI special agent for 24 years. and principal deputy director of the National Counterterrorism Center)
thehill.com
Tom |
|