SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FIFO_kid2 who wrote (62975)12/17/2019 2:52:07 PM
From: bruwin1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Lance Bredvold

  Read Replies (3) of 78774
 
Here's the thing about many of the retail stores who are, obviously, in competition with others in that sector ....

Due to the Highly Competitive nature of their business, where PRICE OF PRODUCT IS ONE OF THE PRIMARY CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE CUSTOMER/CONSUMER, their MARGINS ARE THEREFORE VERY LOW.

Here are 5 examples from within the top 20 in terms of their EBITDA and NET INCOME(NI) MARGINS as per their TTM numbers :-

Walmart (WMT) :- EBITDA = 4.2%. NI = 2.8%
Kroger (KR) :- EBITDA = 3.9%. NI = 1.3%
Costco (COST) :- EBITDA = 3.2%. NI = 2.4%
Best Buy (BBY) :- EBITDA = 4.8%. NI = 3.5%
CVS Corp (CVS) :- EBITDA = 4.8%. NI = 1.9%

So you have these massive organizations, working their butts off, for minimal returns of between only 1.3% to 3.5%.

If one thinks about it, that doesn't leave much "room for error" should anything negative occur for the company.
Because if NI goes Negative that reduces the value of their Balance Sheet if no share capital has been pumped into the business.

Seems to me that there are far better, less "bottom line" risky investment options out there in the stock market .....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext