SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bentway who wrote (148892)1/3/2020 1:31:48 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) of 357196
 
The claim is ridiculous. That's why I'm unclear on what Lane's suggesting.

We cannot even show that CO2 has a role here, and yet we have numerous approaches to reducing CO2 in the atmosphere.

And to date, there is scant evidence to suggest CO2 has a harmful effect.

We should be easily able to plant to sufficient trees to sequester sufficient carbon until newer technologies supplant high-emission technologies from years gone by. Even if it were a problem, which it isn't.

To be clear, over time, climate changes, and people cause a small portion of it -- and sea level has been increasing for centuries. There is no indication as to whether that is likely to change anytime soon.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News