SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum
MU 344.97+5.5%Jan 9 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Patrick Hennessey who wrote (27078)1/24/1998 10:22:00 AM
From: Ted The Technician  Read Replies (1) of 53903
 
TXN is more stable than MU.

85% of TXN's revenue is from semiconductors.
Of this 85%, less than 20% is from DRAM sales.
I believe they made a loss this last quarter from
the DRAM side of the house. Of this 85%, about
40% is from DSP which is projected to grow at
a 30% annual rate. The rest of its semiconductor
business is from logic and controllers.

MU is heavily concentrated in the memory market
which increases investment risk. I don't believe
that it is making any profit with DRAM prices so
low. MU doesn't seem to have a plant in Asia to
take advantage of lower production costs. The
Asian companies will continue to have a labor cost
advantage for at least a year. The Koreans already
have 64-bit technology, so they can continue to
price DRAMs very competitively for the next year.

The big unknown is whether the Koreans will change
their marketing strategy (i.e., focus on profitability
rather than market share).

I believe MU has become a more speculitive vehicle
rather than an investment vehicle, and it's stock price
is driven by fluctuating commodity DRAM prices.

In summary, I see TXN being flat for the next
year while MU will be volitile.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext