SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 375.93-1.8%Nov 14 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
dvdw©
To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (152521)1/15/2020 6:16:57 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 217795
 
In the meantime, comments about the 'trade' war ...

Besides the hawks being disappointed,

China opening up financial services and up game in IP were initiatives pre-dating war, and China best do for own good

China buying fungible energy at competitive pricing is a matter of course except for strategic reasons, and to keep Iranians / Russians honest

I am guessing a lot of what HK ‘imports’ shall be channeled to Shenzhen imports and Shenzhen exports

China buying food … duh … now can hit Canada, and Australia hard, and enforce Brazil honesty as Team America has thrown them under the bus

China buying anything tech … nuclear this, chips that, … let’s see Phase IV assuming we get to Phase II

Canada best release Meng, and Australia best re-think 5G supplier

Russia shall have to make up trade deficit by increasing weapons know-how content

In the meantime,

bloomberg.com

China Agrees to Buy Rare Earths That U.S. Doesn’t Have to Give
Luzi-Ann Javier

LISTEN TO ARTICLE
Terms of Trade is a daily newsletter that untangles a world embroiled in trade wars. Sign up here.

The phase one trade deal that lists the items China agreed to buy more from the U.S. includes rare earths that are already in short supply in the North American nation.

Scandium, used in missile guidance systems and other defense applications, and yttrium that goes into targeting systems are among the critical minerals that the U.S. Commerce vowed to secure at the height of the trade war between Beijing and Washington. The two are included in the long list of manufactured goods itemized in the 86-page agreement signed Wednesday.

No scandium was mined in the U.S. in 2018 and the small amount produced in the country comes exclusively as a byproduct for tailings and residues of other materials, the U.S. Geological Survey said in its website. The country’s net import reliance accounts for 100% of its apparent demand of scandium, it said. Imports of yttrium are equal to more than 95% of domestic consumption, it said.

Increasing U.S. rare earth exports could contradict a Commerce Department recommendation last year to secure supply of these raw materials, including improving the government’s understanding of domestic sources and expediting approvals of mining permits.

“As with our energy security, the Trump administration is dedicated to ensuring that we are never held hostage to foreign powers for the natural resources critical to our national security and economic growth,” Interior Secretary David Bernhardt said in June 2019.

There is skepticism that rare earths will be shipped to China from the U.S. The minerals may have been added to the list so any potential shipments containing these elements could be counted toward Beijing’s HK$1.55 billion commitment under the agreement, Andrew Ginsburg, an analyst at RW Pressprich & Co., said

Read more: U.S., China Sign Phase One of Trade Deal Three Years in Making

China has “made really big commitments so they would want to count as many products as possible, even if they import a tiny amount of a specific good within each subcategory,” Ginsburg said in an email. “If it is not included in the list, they might not get credit toward their commitment totals.”

The same can be said of iron and steel that were added to the list of manufactured goods, Ginsburg said.

“It’s nothing super fundamental for the steel industry,” Andrew Cosgrove, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, said in a telephone interview, ruling out a change in demand for the metal after the deal. “There’s no definitive numbers for any of it, and I don’t think it’s really going to change the capex cycle” for steelmakers, he said.

— With assistance by Justina Vasquez

(Adds comment from analysts beginning in 7th paragraph.)

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext