SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (150553)1/20/2020 8:52:03 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (2) of 353871
 
It is a lie to assert that only Obama was in the negotiations (the negotiations were multilateral, not bilateral) and it is a lie to assert that the agreement gave Iran nuclear weapons, which was what your original claim was. If the agreement was in force, it may or may not have been the case that they would continue developing a nuclear weapon after the 15 years was up. It would have been up to the five nations that negotiated the treaty to get together with Iran and find a way to prevent that. If Iran had restarted their program, there was nothing to stop them from slapping sanctions on Iran again. As it is, Iran could get a nuclear weapon in the next one to two years, according to Israeli intelligence (cf haaretz.com ). That doesn't seem like an improvement over a 15 year delay, to say the least.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News