Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

To: Katelew who wrote (702231)	1/28/2020 5:22:03 PM
From: Tom Clarke	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 794330

Let's review the facts: 1. Maggie Haberman who wrote the article is now backstroking. 2. Trump, Mulvaney and Barr all deny it. Trump says he never had a conversation with Bolton about the matter at all. 3. Bolton's book is due out. Would NSC clear it if such a claim was in it? Does the NSC have power to determine executive privilege? It does not. So such a conversation is highly unlikely to be in the book. 4. The agent for the book, perhaps thru a cut out, leaked this POS to drive up the sales. 5. Maggie bit because it suits the Dems demand for his testimony. 6. Nothing in Bolton's career indicates he would do such a thing. That's my hypothesis and until something better comes along, I'm sticking with it. Clarice Feldman facebook.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next