SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bruwin who wrote (1197810)2/1/2020 1:34:00 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 1576346
 
I did not see all of the arguments of the entire sham process. I just applied my method of parsing.
As soon as I heard no crime was cited in the articles I looked into what that legally suggested.

Consider.
Engineering solutions use the same process to look at the laws of nature and then figure out what that means to whatever solution I am trying to control or create. The laws of invisible forces are far far more complex to understand than the meaning of words in dictionaries. e-fields, h-fields, gravity, force, strain, refraction, reflection, impedance, wave properties, interference, resonance. In many cases the laws of invisible forces are not well understood or defined.

The law is simple in so so many cases. This is simple a mean b and b means c serial logic question.

The problems the demoscum have is they are dictionary imbeciles. They are also law imbeciles.
Or as I would judge the likely human nature explanation lying sacks of feces.

The articles of impeachment as voted for by 229 democrat congressmen under oath specified no legally defined crime was committed by the President.

There was no law cited that had been violated. This means whatever was supposed to be a high crime and misdemeaner completely fell into the legal definition of a Bill of Attainder that is specifically prohibited within the constitution.

law.cornell.edu A “Bills of attainder . . . are such special acts of the legislature, as inflict capital punishments upon persons supposed to be guilty of high offences, such as treason and felony, without any conviction in the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.

The articles of impeachment were thus Bills of attainder or bills of pains and penalties.

The constitution prohibits Bills of attainder

My conclusion is that any vote not to accquit Presient Trump is a certification, a validation, a verification that the caster of said vote is a dictionary imbecile. They are also law imbeciles.
Or as I would judge the likely human nature explanation lying sacks of feces.

What is a crime.

crime dictionary.law.com
n. a violation of a law in which there is injury to the public or a member of the public and a term in jail or prison, and/or a fine as possible penalties. There is some sentiment for excluding from the "crime" category crimes without victims, such as consensual acts, or violations in which only the perpetrator is hurt or involved such as personal use of illegal drugs.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext