SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
pocotrader
To: longnshort who wrote (1198076)2/2/2020 2:01:51 PM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation   of 1573909
 
OOPS! Monica Lewinsky on Trump impeachment witnesses: ‘gee … I had to give that videoed witness testimony…’
Published: Feb 1, 2020 8:54 a.m. ET
marketwatch.com
By NICOLELYN PESCE

After Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander released a statement on Thursday night saying that he will not vote to hear witnesses in President Trump’s impeachment trial, claiming that the commander-in-chief’s actions have been “inappropriate” but not “impeachable,” former impeachment trial witness Monica Lewinsky had this to say:

“gee, too bad i had to give that videoed witness testimony for the senate trial in the clinton impeachment. (i mean, talk about unflattering lighting and having a bad hair day.)”Monica Lewinsky

That struck a chord with Twitter TWTR, -2.23% users furious over the fact that Alexander and other Republican senators are likely to block a vote to call witnesses on Friday, meaning the president could be acquitted as early as Friday night. The hashtag #WeWantWitnessesAndDocuments had drawn about 40,000 tweets by Friday morning, while #LamarsLegacy and #LamarAlexanderIsACoward were also trending.

Lewinsky’s tweet had drawn several hundred comments and almost 30,000 likes by Friday midmorning.


Monica Lewinsky

?@MonicaLewinsky

gee, too bad i had to give that videoed witness testimony for the senate trial in the clinton impeachment. (i mean, talk about unflattering lighting and having a bad hair day.)

136K
5:43 AM - Jan 31, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy

23.8K people are talking about this

Lewinsky has been pointing out the differences between the Clinton impeachment and the Trump impeachment on her Twitter feed throughout this whole process. She tweeted “Are you f----ing kidding me?” earlier this month, which appeared to respond to former independent counsel Ken Starr being appointed to the president’s defense team. Starr and Robert Ray, another lawyer added to the team, had exposed President Bill Clinton’s sexual relationship with Lewinsky, then a White House intern, during the counselors’ five-year investigation of the Whitewater land-development deal in Arkansas in which Bill and Hillary Clinton participated. The allegations in the Starr report led to Clinton’s 1998 impeachment.

So when University of Southern California law professor Orin Kerr mused on Twitter last spring about what it would have been like if the Starr report (whose 453 pages were released in full) got the same treatment as the Mueller report (whose disputed four-page summary by Attorney General William Barr predated by several weeks the release of the redacted two-volume, 448-page Mueller report), Lewinsky responded, “if. f—ing. only.” In other words, she suggested that if the details of her private life been kept secret, she might have avoided being the subject of harassment, ridicule and abuse in the media and online since 1998.

Lewinsky has become an advocate against cyberbullying since then, as well as a public speaker on digital privacy, reputation and resilience.

But she noted in interviews last fall that the Trump impeachment has made her a “punchline” again, although she also acknowledged that this investigation and trial is a “constitutional crisis, [and] it’s much bigger than me.”
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext