SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
FJB
To: koan who wrote (1181027)2/6/2020 11:15:08 AM
From: Maple MAGA 1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 1574996
 
Evicted to Make Room for Culture-Enrichers

The following video from Germany reports on a practice that has now become fairly commonplace: the eviction of elderly native citizens from their apartments to make room for a higher-density cohort of migrants. This is happening not only in Germany, but also in Sweden, and possibly other Western European countries as well. Several years ago there was a proposal to do something similar in the UK. Older residents whose children had grown up and left home were said to be “selfish” to hang onto to their large residences with all those empty bedrooms, given that there was a housing shortage in the country. And that shortage was, of course, due to mass immigration from the Third World.

What I notice about these stories from Germany is that the evicting landlord is always the municipal government. In the USA, almost all rental properties are privately owned. There is some government-owned housing, but even Section 8 housing is usually privately-owned with a government subsidy. If eviction takes place, it is a private landlord doing the evicting.

In Germany, however, the municipalities seem to own most of the urban apartments. That means when the government implements a policy of resettling migrants, it can push people out of their apartments when needed. Displaced tenants evidently have some options for making legal appeals, but not as much as they would if their rental contracts were in the private sector.

Video link

Video transcript:

00:00 A 150-square-meter apartment with six rooms for €500 per month.
00:04 You can hardly get an apartment like that anymore.
00:08 Klaus Roth and his partner have lived in such an apartment in Neckartailfingen for 24 years.
00:14 The two assumed that nothing would change in their living situation
00:18 before they received mail from the municipality.
00:21 What is going on here? I was asked to come to the town hall.
00:25 I thought they just wanted to talk to me, and now
00:28 they are giving me an eviction notice. They told me, well,
00:31 you know that we need flats for the asylum seekers.
00:34 The Roths won’t settle for that, so both parties have met in court.
00:41 Klaus Roth and his partner Maria Seidl are trying to clear the air
00:45 with Mayor Gerhard Gaedicke at the Nürtingen district court.
00:49 The retired couple will be evicted from their six-room apartment in Neckartailfingen.
00:53 They are willing to do so,
00:56 but the price and the surroundings must be right.
01:00 So the main point was to get a moving allowance, not only for the costs,
01:04 but also to clean out the apartment and put the furniture back together in the new apartment.
01:12 They also don’t want to pay a deposit because
01:15 they didn’t pay for their current apartment from the municipality.
01:19 These demands still have to be approved by the municipal council.
01:22 At the moment, the mayor has offered the couple a two-room apartment.
01:26 I have now offered them another apartment to look at, which is the third one we’ve offered
01:30 to Mr. Roth and his partner. By this, I think you can see that
01:35 as landlords we are very responsible towards our tenants.
01:39 No one is being thrown out on the street. We are offering an alternative.
01:43 If these options aren’t sufficient, the community
01:46 has no others to offer. —The retired couple have been
01:50 living in this apartment for 24 years. Klaus Roth has
01:54 put a lot of initiative and money into the rental apartment.
01:57 However, last year the community terminated their
02:00 rental agreement due to its own needs. —We, like all communities
02:05 in Esslingen county, have to take in and
02:10 accommodate asylum seekers, and that’s the reason why we want to use this apartment.
02:16 Neckartailfingen still has to accommodate a total of nine refugees.
02:20 This six-room apartment with 150 square meters,
02:23 a balcony, and a garden is earmarked for them. On the other hand, the question arises as to why
02:29 the over-70 pensioner couple are being forced to move out?
02:32 Klaus Roth has already suffered a stroke and
02:35 a move is unreasonable burden for him. —He’s not healthy,
02:39 and his partner is also very incapacitated health-wise.
02:42 So for me there is a question of whether this eviction and move go beyond reasonable expectations.
02:46 Should both sides not agree in March, the judge must make the ruling
02:49 and assess the limits of reasonable expectation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext