EDTA (was GIFT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)

EDTA 0.0000500

0.0%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ANGELIQUE LEE who wrote (775)	10/3/1996 10:37:00 PM
From: Mel Spivak	of 2383

I went to the site ... and here's what I think. Basically, the CT case is taking a "back seat" to the SDNY case. At the site, go to the SDNY case and go to the "Report" which is GIFT's 287 page datailing of how each of the defendants infringed on the claims of the patent. It is quite understandable in the "side-by-side" format that it is presented in. Any "non-believers" of the patent should take a look. Just look at the claims against Broderbund, for starters. The claims of the patent fits "nice and tight" around the necks of these defendants and of the many others who will make up GIFT's $98B market. However, we will have to "keep the faith" thru 12/8 when the hearings "may" actually get going soon thereafter. Mel I am "sleeping well" (Zzzzz $98B * 5% Zzzzzzzz)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next