2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 437.23

+3.8%

Jan 20 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lazarus who wrote (153396)	2/20/2020 1:59:06 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 219583

The 2.8% is a bung figure because it compares the number of deaths with the number of cases. The death rate should compare the number of deaths with the number of those who did get sick but are now recovered. Some of those still sick will die. The correct death rate is more like 5% which is a horribly serious death rate and cannot be sensibly compared with the 0.1%(Or whatever it is) of regular flu which mainly kills those already in trouble from age and other debilitation. Corona2020 kills medical people like Dr Urbani was killed by sars or maybe it was h5n1. China is right to be very serious about C20. Meanwhile I'm out of the disease zone back in Auckland. I was concerned that the infections in Singapore might leave me stranded. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next