Eddy,
Craig Crawford cannot do anything to appreciably effect the price of FIBR by what he posts on these threads. The volume traded lately was well beyond the means of this and the yahoo thread, no offense to any big wheels, but we saw institutional activity here recently.
Craig can raise doubt in the minds of those long the stock, who don't have a clear understanding of the risks. If you DO understand the risks, then Craigs posts are no more than noise. I need him to tell me that a small conglomeration of small business's challenging on the turf of the likes of Cisco, Lucent and 3COM is risky? Please, enough already.
The basic principle here is this. An investment in one of these giants has a lower downside and a lower upside. Osicom has a downside down to flat broke and out of business and an upside all the way to becoming a Cisco. It's called risk/reward. You play the game by not putting all your eggs into the risky basket, but enough that it will mean something should they take off.
Noone investing in FIBR should be unprepared to lose it all. Now if you pass the test of this statement, what difference does Craigs opinion make?
I really need to stop reading this thread for a while and Eddy I strongly urge you to do the same.
Also, let it calm you by saying that Osicom does read this thread and their lawyers are prepared for anything that is said that is slanderous or liabelous. If you doubt that ask Craig, he's had a nice long chat with Osi's lawyers in the past.
Scott |
