SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: j g cordes who wrote (16945)1/26/1998 1:52:00 AM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
J.G.,

I have to agree with your staement 100%. This is a very dangerous precedent.

I do not think Clinton will be found guilty of perjury. I also do not think he will be found guity of obstruction of justice. For the perjury charge to stick, there must be an unambiguous question and he must give an unambiguous answer that is untrue. Everything I have heard to date about this matter is ambiguous questions and ambiguous answers. The obstruction of justice charge is even looser.

So for a lot of the people the question has become can they impeach him for sexual activity? A lot of people would like to see him impeached for this. But then that rationale applied to congress would cause the removal of probably 60% of our Congressmen and Senators. The Kinsey report has about 61% of married men reporting that they have had sex outside of marriage. I am sure the number is similarly high for women. Otherwise, who are they going to do it with?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News