SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA
AMD 233.34+0.7%1:31 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: fastpathguru who wrote (36188)3/20/2020 4:24:56 PM
From: eetnoyerRead Replies (1) of 73853
 
Now, now. Lying by omission is still lying. To help you with your analysis, below is a copy of my original reply, in its entirety. The highlighting may help you. An accusation requires an individual. My assertion was merely a reflection on history and application of a statistical near-certainty. 1 part scum + 1 part scum doesn't equal 1/2 strength scum. Likewise, acknowledging that more than 1 person has committed a crime doesn't make any criminal less guilty. That assertion seems to be entirely of your own creation.

Since I'm not the sort to cherry-pick parts of a post and misrepresent them, I will continue to allow the reply history to be my point of reference.

And you think it's just Republicans that are guilty of it? I can guarantee that there are lots on both sides of the aisle that did exactly the same thing. I'm sure there are plenty of un-elected officials in the agencies in the same boat. What are the odds that a massive number of politicians and bureaucrats of all stripes are scum? Almost like positions of power tend to draw the types of people that shouldn't be allowed anywhere near it. Who knew Douglas Adams was such a prophet? Or that human history demonstrates that governments always trend towards tyranny?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext