2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 387.98

+1.3%

Nov 28 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Dr. Voodoo

marcher

To: sense who wrote (155374)	3/27/2020 2:19:06 AM
From: TobagoJack	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 218074

From the link you cited, <<They said 38% of the victims did not have preexisting health conditions.>> The number seems to indicate a state worse than in the general population, and if valid, am going to attribute to work stress / immunity bias, iow, the productive are being taken down, or something else going on bears watching Most 81-90 would have preexisting conditions, so the 38% unlikely to be part of the 31%. Ditto for 71-80 and 61-70. But 38% cannot have all be part of the 8% + 15%, mathematically. << Officials released some demographic information about those who died. They said 38% of the victims did not have preexisting health conditions. Age breakdown of victims: Age 40-50: 8% Age 51-60: 15% Age 61-70: 31% Age 71-80: 15% Age 81-90: 31%>>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next