How about a nice game of chess?
You take the white army. In this game, that army is called "reality".
I'll take black. It's called "the market's response to reality in order to not be beaten".
The rules say, YOU, as reality, must come up with your own moves all by yourself.
The rules also say, I get artificial help.
When I make a move for which I was led entirely by the help I received, the "helper's" reasoning is sometimes undecipherable to me. So sometimes I have to just make shit up when the press conference about the move I made rolls around.
It comes across as 111000101010100010101001010100101010 most of the time.
Artificial intelligence is my "help".
I'm the Central Bank algorithms and the trading algorithms.
It's all digital.
Moves are made looking forward beyond just the next one.
I move on Pulses.
You move during TE windows.
The board is 3 dimensional.
The question now is, will containment measures hold?
If, before April 6, price movement takes the indicator higher than it was on March 26, that gain will disappear before the 10th.
If, before April 6, price movement takes the indicator out of containment downward, the lowest of the 3 current trigger lines will be most important as the 10th approaches.
If it stays within containment, there will be a tight 1,2,3 (up down up or down up down) going into the apex of the pulse. High volatility coming out of the pulse is a common result of this "tightening" activity.
Those are the 3 alternatives at this point as defined by the volatility constraints within every pane, as previously discussed.
Anything other than the above...like a complete dropout of the indicator before the 6th...would be from an unexpected (by all) negative bit of reality.
 |
