Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives

SPY 689.10

0.0%

Jan 23 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (143462)	4/4/2020 6:41:52 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	2 Recommendations Recommended By Hawkmoon Thomas M. Read Replies (1) of 222362

Oh, okay, I thought that's what you were saying but I wasn't sure... The arrogance and intellectual snobbery among researchers and big pharma is well known within their circles... Yes, absolutely, and I think you're 100% right... that would very easily explain those "failed" trials when it was so highly effective in real time on real cases... This kind of fraud has to be exposed quickly and this is not the first time think kind of pharma fraud has happened, it happens all the time... When I was working on my Doctorate in Chicago we did lots of studies at the university and we were very familiar with the need to publish our research findings in the professional journals in order to attain credibility within that field... On one occasion, some guys I knew, also fellow graduate students but in another field of study, completed a study that showed the effectiveness of some dependent variable, it was such a solid and well designed study that the professional journal agreed to publish their study and their findings... after they received their letter of acceptance for publication from the editors of that journal, they soon received a second letter from those same editors apologizing because they later decided not to publish that study... Of course, these guys were pissed about it after celebrating their publishing success... Looking into the reason why the journal decided against publishing that study, it was learned that one of the big pharma companies that pays for the publishing of the journal itself did not want that study to be published and known to the rest of the scientific community... The big pharma company didn't want to publish a well designed study that would expose the fact that the medication this pharma is producing is really not necessary... So, this kind of thing is very common within those circles and I've seen it first hand. and which is why I immediately thought that the trial itself is failed since it works so well in real cases, of course which researchers minimize as merely "anecdotal" incidents and therefore "don't count" as legitimate... All this means that Dr. Fauci needs to rise above that kind of hard driven and deeply inbred intellectual research snobbery if he's going to perform a credible service to our country... GZ

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next