SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 387.98+1.3%Nov 28 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
pak73
sense
To: TobagoJack who wrote (156222)4/9/2020 6:24:58 AM
From: THE ANT2 Recommendations   of 218107
 
I am not saying hydroxychloroquine definitely works .As a physician I make risk benefits decisions 100s of time of day. The risks have been known for 100 years and during my course in tropical medicine at John Hopkins in my MPH course the risks of hydroxychloroquine were considered worth the benefit for malaria prevention. If someone can show me a couple of good studies that it clearly doesn't work for COVID 19 I would love to see them and might not take mine at the time That Newsweek article Julius shared was no less than trash. It made a big issue of one patient being stopped during a study and clearly was trying to serve disinformation. The news media told people not to wear a mask when the benefit/risk wearing was enormous. Why? Do you think that an extra 1000 masks got to healthcare workers? I doubt it .Did they want the illness to take hold? The journalistic disinformation on mask use has killed thousands for a skewed political purpose. Those on this board who knowingly pass on false/ inflammatory/ misleading data for political purpose, especially in the medical field when it clearly can harm others, are the same breed
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext