SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (31580)4/15/2020 6:16:27 PM
From: elpolvo  Read Replies (1) of 32917
 
We actually had one more winner in TEDennis, though via PM. Like you,
he had many different answers depending on this or that. It took me a while
to pin him down to what he thought *should* not *could* be the right answer.
my initial thought was that this (?)
was this (7)

which woulda made the answer 70

so NOW we'd have three answers...

1) woulda = 70
2) coulda = 63 plus ?
3) shoulda = 106

if we add those three together and divide by three we have an
"average" answer of 79.666666(ad infinitum) plus (? ÷ 3)
(which you certainly wouldn't get from elpolvo or Graystone or
TEDennis because they're far from "average" mathematicians.)

since i already have one of the blue Silicon Investor T-shirts
i'm willing to withdraw my "coulda" answer from consideration.
this makes the new "average" answer 88 - creating a tie between
Kitskid (83) and longz (93) who only missed the "average" answer
of woulda and shoulda by 5.

but... i could be wrong... please check my math (and my latin)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News