Little Engine -- I don't feel as though I am your equal in issues such as the ones you have discussed at length on this thread, so I don't wish to debate you. You obviously have spent a lot of time crunching numbers and digging up every possible reason to dislike this company, its stock, and its management. However, would you care to address a statement in your most recent post where you assume FAMH has borrowed $25 MM from the European "financial concern"? I don't recall the press release, scant though it was, detailing the fact that the company had in fact borrowed the money at this point.
My point is this: You apparently are compelled to dissect every statement, every bit of information coming from the company in an effort to discredit(?) what they're doing. I'm going to turn the tables and ask why you are advertising that the company has indeed borrowed this money already? Then I'll ask a question for you or anyone to answer: What group, foreign or otherwise -- named or unnamed, would extend such a line of credit to a company which, according to your assessment, is hardly worthy of such trust?
I don't know the answer and, as I stated above, I am not qualified to debate you on this topic. But fair is fair and in my opinion, you have provided the same type of misleading information you continually claim FAMH provides.
Regards,
Scott |
